Skip Navigation



Plant and Cell Physiology Advance Access published online on February 8, 2007

Plant and Cell Physiology, doi:10.1093/pcp/pcm019
This Article
Right arrow Advance Access manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
48/3/484    most recent
pcm019v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tsujimoto, R.
Right arrow Articles by Omata, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tsujimoto, R.
Right arrow Articles by Omata, T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Tsujimoto, R.
Right arrow Articles by Omata, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Japanese Society of Plant Physiologists. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Distinct Roles of Nitrate and Nitrite in Regulation of Expression of the Nitrate Transport Genes in the Moss Physcomitrella patens

Ryoma Tsujimoto, Hidemasa Yamazaki, Shin-ichi Maeda and Tatsuo Omata

Laboratory of Molecular Plant Physiology, Graduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Chikusa, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan

Corresponding author: Tatsuo Omata, Laboratory of Molecular Plant Physiology, Graduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan, Phone: +81-52-789-4106 FAX: +81-52-789-4107 E-mail: omata{at}agr.nagoya-u.ac.jp


   Abstract

Five NRT2 genes and three Nar2 genes, encoding putative high-affinity nitrate transporters, and the respective cDNAs were identified and characterized in Physcomitrella patens. The deduced moss NRT2 and NAR2 proteins were more similar to the corresponding proteins of higher plants than to those of the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Expression of all the genes was inhibited by ammonium added to the medium. The regulation by ammonium was abolished by an inhibitor of glutamine synthetase, but the effect of this inhibitor was counteracted by an inhibitor of glutamate synthase. Negative correlation was observed between the glutamine content of protonemata and the transcript levels of PpNRT2 and PpNar2. These results indicated that glutamine is the signal for repression of the genes. All the genes but PpNRT2;5 showed transient expression stimulated by nitrate but not by nitrite, peaking at 2 to 4 h after deprivation of ammonium from medium. When the glutamine synthetase inhibitor was used to inhibit assimilation of the ammonium generated intracellularly from nitrate or nitrite, the second phase of activation of genes became manifest at ~8 h after the deprivation of ammonium. Surprisingly, both nitrate and nitrite stimulated gene expression at this stage. PpNRT2;5 was distinct from the other genes in that its expression is sharply induced by nitrite, is strictly dependent on nitrite or nitrate, and is much less susceptible to the feedback regulation, retaining a constant level in nitrate-containing medium. These results indicated that P. patens has multiple mechanisms for sensing nitrate and nitrite.

Keywords: Gene regulation - Moss - Nitrate transporter - Physcomitrella patens


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eukaryot CellHome page
E. Fernandez and A. Galvan
Nitrate Assimilation in Chlamydomonas
Eukaryot. Cell, April 1, 2008; 7(4): 555 - 559.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
R. Wang, X. Xing, and N. Crawford
Nitrite Acts as a Transcriptome Signal at Micromolar Concentrations in Arabidopsis Roots
Plant Physiology, December 1, 2007; 145(4): 1735 - 1745.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.