Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Christensen, S.
Right arrow Articles by Silverthorne, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Christensen, S.
Right arrow Articles by Silverthorne, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Christensen, S.
Right arrow Articles by Silverthorne, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Plant and Cell Physiology, 2002, Vol. 43, No. 7 768-777
© 2002 Oxford University Press

Ginkgo biloba Retains Functions of Both Type I and Type II Flowering Plant Phytochrome

Steen Christensen1, Erica LaVerne, Gabriel Boyd and Jane Silverthorne2

Department of Molecular, Cell and Developmental Biology, Sinsheimer Laboratories, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, U.S.A.

While the photoreceptor systems of flowering plants have been well studied, the origins of these gene families and their functions are only partially understood. To begin to resolve the evolutionary origins of angiosperm photoreceptor function, we have studied the photomorphogenic responses of the early diverging gymnosperm Ginkgo biloba. Here, we describe the effects of continuous white light, red light, far-red light, and blue light on stem length, chlorophyll accumulation, Lhcb mRNA accumulation, and plastid development. Differences in the efficacy of these light regimes on de-etiolation in Ginkgo suggest separate but complementary roles for red and blue light-sensing systems. Additionally, the unique manner in which developmental regulation occurs in Ginkgo reveals a far-red high irradiance response different from both angiosperm and other gymnosperm species. We conclude from these data that Ginkgo contains a functional complement to both flowering plant type I and type II phytochromes, as well as independent blue light-sensing system(s). The implications of these findings are discussed with respect to the evolution of higher plant photoreceptors.

1 Present address: National Institute for Basic Biology, Myodaiji-cho 38, Okazaki, 444-8585 Japan.

2 Corresponding author: E-mail, silverthorne@biology.ucsc.edu; Fax, +1-831-459-3737.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J HeredHome page
S. Mathews
Phytochrome Evolution in Green and Nongreen Plants
J. Hered., May 1, 2005; 96(3): 197 - 204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
S. Mathews, J. G. Burleigh, and M. J. Donoghue
Adaptive Evolution in the Photosensory Domain of Phytochrome A in Early Angiosperms
Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2003; 20(7): 1087 - 1097.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.