Skip Navigation


Plant and Cell Physiology Advance Access originally published online on April 11, 2006
Plant and Cell Physiology 2006 47(6):706-714; doi:10.1093/pcp/pcj041
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
47/6/706    most recent
pcj041v2
pcj041v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Park, E.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, T. H. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Park, E.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, T. H. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Park, E.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, T. H. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Exogenous Application of Glycinebetaine Increases Chilling Tolerance in Tomato Plants

Eung-Jun Park1, Zoran Jeknic and Tony H. H. Chen*

Department of Horticulture, ALS 4017, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA

* Corresponding author: E-mail, chent{at}hort.oregonstate.edu; Fax, +1-541-737-3479.

Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. cv. Moneymaker) plants are chilling sensitive, and do not naturally accumulate glycinebetaine (GB), a metabolite that functions as a stress protectant. We reported previously that exogenous GB application enhanced chilling tolerance in tomato. To understand its protective role better, we have further evaluated various parameters associated with improved tolerance. Although its effect was most pronounced in younger plants, this benefit was diminished 1 week after GB application. When administered by foliar spray, GB was readily taken up and translocated to various organs, with the highest levels being measured in meristematic tissues, including the shoot apices and flower buds. In leaves, the majority of endogenous GB was found in the cytosol; only 0.6–22.0% of the total leaf GB was localized in chloroplasts. Immediately after GB application, levels of H2O2, catalase activity and expression of the catalase gene (CAT1) were all higher in GB-treated than in control plants. One day after exposure to chilling stress, the treated plants had significantly greater catalase activity and CAT1 expression, although their H2O2 levels remained unchanged. During the following 2 d of this chilling treatment, GB-treated plants maintained lower H2O2 levels but had higher catalase activity than the controls. These results suggest that, in addition to protecting macromolecules and membranes directly, GB-enhanced chilling tolerance may involve the induction of H2O2-mediated antioxidant mechanisms, e.g. enhanced catalase expression and catalase activity.

1 Present address: Department of Plant Biotechnology, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Kangwon National University, Chunchon, 200-701, Korea

(Received January 20, 2006; Accepted March 20, 2006)
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.