Skip Navigation


Plant and Cell Physiology Advance Access originally published online on October 3, 2006
Plant and Cell Physiology 2006 47(11):1530-1540; doi:10.1093/pcp/pcl019
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
47/11/1530    most recent
pcl019v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Desaki, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Shibuya, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Desaki, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Shibuya, N.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Desaki, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Shibuya, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Japanese Society of Plant Physiologists. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Bacterial Lipopolysaccharides Induce Defense Responses Associated with Programmed Cell Death in Rice Cells

Yoshitake Desaki1, Ayako Miya1, Balakrishnan Venkatesh2, Shinji Tsuyumu2, Hisakazu Yamane3, Hanae Kaku1, Eiichi Minami4 and Naoto Shibuya1,*

1Department of Life Sciences, School of Agriculture, Meiji University, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 214-8571 Japan
2Faculty of Agriculture, Shizuoka University, Shizuoka, 422-8529 Japan
3Biotechnology Research Center, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8657 Japan
4Department of Biochemistry, National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8602 Japan

* Corresponding author: E-mail, shibuya{at}isc.meiji.ac.jp; Fax, +81-44-934-7039.


   Abstract

PAMP (pathogen-associated molecular pattern) recognition plays an important role during the innate immune response in both plants and animals. Lipopolysaccharides (LPS) derived from Gram-negative bacteria are representative of typical PAMP molecules and have been reported to induce defense-related responses, including the suppression of the hypersensitive response, the expression of defense genes and systemic resistance in plants. However, the details regarding the precise molecular mechanisms underlying these cellular responses, such as the molecular machinery involved in the perception and transduction of LPS molecules, remain largely unknown. Furthermore, the biological activities of LPS on plants have so far been reported only in dicots and no information is thus available regarding their functions in monocots. In our current study, we report that LPS preparations for various becteria, including plant pathogens and non-pathogens, can induce defense responses in rice cells, including reactive oxygen generation and defense gene expression. In addition, global analysis of gene expression induced by two PAMPs, LPS and chitin oligosaccharide, also reveals a close correlation between the gene responses induced by these factors. This indicates that there is a convergence of signaling cascades downstream of their corresponding receptors. Furthermore, we show that the defense responses induced by LPS in the rice cells are associated with programmed cell death (PCD), which is a finding that has not been previously reported for the functional role of these molecules in plant cells. Interestingly, PCD induction by the LPS was not detected in cultured Arabidopsis thaliana cells.

Keywords: Defense response - Elicitor - Lipopolysaccharide - PAMPs - Programmed cell death - Rice

Abbreviations: CTAB, cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide; DAPI, 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; HR, hypersensitive response; LPS, lipopolysaccharides; PAMP, pathogen-associated molecular pattern; PCD, programmed cell death; PR, pathogenesis-related; ROS, reactive oxygen species; RT–PCR, reverse transcription–PCR; TUNEL, terminal transferase dUTP nick end labeling.

(Received August 13, 2006; Accepted September 26, 2006)
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
T. Yamaguchi, M. Kuroda, H. Yamakawa, T. Ashizawa, K. Hirayae, L. Kurimoto, T. Shinya, and N. Shibuya
Suppression of a Phospholipase D Gene, OsPLD{beta}1, Activates Defense Responses and Increases Disease Resistance in Rice
Plant Physiology, May 1, 2009; 150(1): 308 - 319.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. Miya, P. Albert, T. Shinya, Y. Desaki, K. Ichimura, K. Shirasu, Y. Narusaka, N. Kawakami, H. Kaku, and N. Shibuya
CERK1, a LysM receptor kinase, is essential for chitin elicitor signaling in Arabidopsis
PNAS, December 4, 2007; 104(49): 19613 - 19618.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
T. Shinya, I. Galis, T. Narisawa, M. Sasaki, H. Fukuda, H. Matsuoka, M. Saito, and K. Matsuoka
Comprehensive Analysis of Glucan Elicitor-Regulated Gene Expression in Tobacco BY-2 Cells Reveals a Novel MYB Transcription Factor Involved in the Regulation of Phenylpropanoid Metabolism
Plant Cell Physiol., October 1, 2007; 48(10): 1404 - 1413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Innate ImmunityHome page
M.-A. Newman, J. M. Dow, A. Molinaro, and M. Parrilli
Invited review: Priming, induction and modulation of plant defence responses by bacterial lipopolysaccharides
Innate Immunity, April 1, 2007; 13(2): 69 - 84.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.