Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ishihara, T.
Right arrow Articles by Takahashi, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ishihara, T.
Right arrow Articles by Takahashi, H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ishihara, T.
Right arrow Articles by Takahashi, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Plant and Cell Physiology, 2004, Vol. 45, No. 4 470-480
© 2004 Oxford University Press

Comparative Analysis of Expressed Sequence Tags in Resistant and Susceptible Ecotypes of Arabidopsis thaliana Infected with Cucumber Mosaic Virus

Takeaki Ishihara1, Nozomu Sakurai2, Ken-Taro Sekine1, Shu Hase1, Masato Ikegami1, Daisuke Shibata2 and Hideki Takahashi1,3

1 Department of Life Science, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, 1-1 Tsutsumidori-Amamiyamachi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 981-8555 Japan
2 Kazusa DNA Research Institute, Kisarazu, Chiba, 292-0812 Japan

Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype Columbia (Col-0) is susceptible to the yellow strain of cucumber mosaic virus [CMV(Y)], whereas ecotype C24 is resistant to CMV(Y). Comprehensive analyses of ~9,000 expressed sequence tags in ecotypes Col-0 and C24 infected with CMV(Y) suggested that the gene expression patterns in the two ecotypes differed. At 6, 12, 24 and 48 h after CMV(Y) inoculation, the expression of 6, 30, 85 and 788 genes, respectively, had changed in C24, as opposed to 20, 80, 53 and 150 genes in CMV(Y)-infected Col-0. At 12, 24 and 48 h after CMV(Y) inoculation, the abundance of 3, 10 and 55 mRNAs was altered in both ecotypes. However, at 6 h after CMV(Y) inoculation, no genes were co-induced or co-suppressed in both ecotypes. This differential pattern of gene expression between the two ecotypes at an early stage of CMV(Y) infection indicated that the cellular response for resistance may differ from that resulting in susceptibility at the level detectable by the macroarray. According to the expression pattern at various stages of infection, the expression of many genes could be grouped into clusters using cluster analysis. About 100 genes that encode proteins involved in chloroplast function were categorized into clusters 1 and 4, which had a differentially lower expression in CMV(Y)-inoculated C24. The expression of various genes encoding proteins in the endomembrane system belonged to clusters 2 and 4, which were induced in CMV(Y)-inoculated C24 and Col-0 leaves. Characterization of CMV(Y)-altered gene expression in the two ecotypes will contribute to a better understanding of the molecular basis of compatible and incompatible interactions between virus and host plants.

3 Corresponding author: E-mail, takahash@bios.tohoku.ac.jp; Fax, +81-22-717-8659.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Gen. Virol.Home page
M. Babu, A. G. Gagarinova, J. E. Brandle, and A. Wang
Association of the transcriptional response of soybean plants with soybean mosaic virus systemic infection
J. Gen. Virol., April 1, 2008; 89(4): 1069 - 1080.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
M. I. Elvira, M. M. Galdeano, P. Gilardi, I. Garcia-Luque, and M. T. Serra
Proteomic analysis of pathogenesis-related proteins (PRs) induced by compatible and incompatible interactions of pepper mild mottle virus (PMMoV) in Capsicum chinense L3 plants
J. Exp. Bot., April 1, 2008; 59(6): 1253 - 1265.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.