Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tsonev, T. D.
Right arrow Articles by Hikosaka, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tsonev, T. D.
Right arrow Articles by Hikosaka, K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Tsonev, T. D.
Right arrow Articles by Hikosaka, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Plant and Cell Physiology, 2003, Vol. 44, No. 8 828-835
© 2003 Oxford University Press

Contribution of Photosynthetic Electron Transport, Heat Dissipation, and Recovery of Photoinactivated Photosystem II to Photoprotection at Different Temperatures in Chenopodium album Leaves

Tsonko D. Tsonev1,2 and Kouki Hikosaka1,3

1 Graduate School of Life Sciences, Tohoku University, Aoba, Sendai, 980-8578 Japan
2 Acad. M. Popov Institute of Plant Physiology, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Acad. G. Bonchev Str., Bl. 21, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria

Temperature dependence of photoinhibition and photoprotective mechanisms (10–35°C) was investigated for Chenopodium album leaves grown at 25°C under 500 µmol quanta m–2 s–1. The fraction of active photosystem II (PSII) was determined after photoinhibitory treatment at different temperatures in the presence and absence of lincomycin, an inhibitor of chloroplast-encoded protein synthesis. In the absence of lincomycin, leaves were more tolerant to photoinhibition at high (25–35°C) than at low (11–15°C) temperatures. In the presence of lincomycin, the variation in the tolerance to photoinactivation became relatively small. The rate constant of photoinactivation (kpi) was stable at 25–35°C and increased by 50% with temperature decrease from 25 to 11°C. The rate constant of recovery of inactivated PSII (krec) was more sensitive to temperature; it was very low at 11°C and increased by an order of magnitude at 35°C. We conclude that the recovery of photoinactivated PSII plays an essential role in photoprotection at 11–35°C. Partitioning of light energy to various photoprotective mechanisms was further analyzed to reveal the factor responsible for kpi. The fraction of energy utilized in photochemistry was lower at lower temperatures. Although the fraction of heat dissipation increased with decreasing temperatures, the excess energy that is neither utilized by photochemistry nor dissipated by heat dissipation was found to be greater at lower temperatures. The kpi value was strongly correlated with the excess energy, suggesting that the excess energy determines the rate of photoinactivation.

3 Corresponding author: E-mail, hikosaka@mail.tains.tohoku.ac.jp; Fax, +81-22-217-6699.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
K. Hikosaka
Nitrogen Partitioning in the Photosynthetic Apparatus of Plantago asiatica Leaves Grown Under Different Temperature and Light Conditions: Similarities and Differences Between Temperature and Light Acclimation
Plant Cell Physiol., August 1, 2005; 46(8): 1283 - 1290.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
N. Hirotsu, A. Makino, A. Ushio, and T. Mae
Changes in the Thermal Dissipation and the Electron Flow in the Water-Water Cycle in Rice Grown Under Conditions of Physiologically Low Temperature
Plant Cell Physiol., May 15, 2004; 45(5): 635 - 644.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.