Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Silva, I. R.
Right arrow Articles by Rufty, T. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Silva, I. R.
Right arrow Articles by Rufty, T. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Silva, I. R.
Right arrow Articles by Rufty, T. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Plant and Cell Physiology, 2001, Vol. 42, No. 5 538-545
© 2001 Oxford University Press

Magnesium is More Efficient than Calcium in Alleviating Aluminum Rhizotoxicity in Soybean and its Ameliorative Effect is not Explained by the Gouy-Chapman-Stern Model

Ivo R. Silva1, Thomas J. Smyth2,5, Daniel W. Israel3, Charles D. Raper2 and Thomas W. Rufty4

1 Department of Soil Science, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil 2 Department of Soil Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, U.S.A. 3 USDA-ARS, Department of Soil Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, U.S.A. 4 Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, U.S.A.

The mechanistic basis for cation amelioration of Al rhizotoxicity in soybean was investigated through a series of studies comparing protective effects of Ca and Mg against Al inhibition of root elongation in a background 0.8 mM CaSO4 solution (pH 4.3). A modified Gouy-Chapman-Stern model was used to evaluate the effect of cations on electrical potential and Al3+ activity at root plasma membrane surfaces. Activities of Al3+ up to 4.6 µM in the background solution inhibited soybean tap root elongation by more than 80%. There was little or no response in root elongation when Ca and Mg were added to background solutions in the absence of Al. When added to Al-toxic solutions in the micromolar concentration range, Mg was 100-fold more effective than Ca in alleviating Al toxicity, whereas both cations were equally effective when added in the millimolar concentration range. The protective effect of micromolar additions of Mg on root elongation was specific for Al and it failed to alleviate La rhizotoxicity. In contrast to wheat, Mg amelioration of Al toxicity to soybean root elongation at low Mg concentration could not be explained by changes in potential and Al3+ activity at the root plasma membrane surfaces as predicted by a Gouy-Chapman-Stern model. These results suggest that Mg is not acting as an indifferent cation when present at low concentration and implies the involvement of a mechanism other than pure electrostatic effects at the root surface.

5 Corresponding author: E-mail, jot_smyth@ncsu.edu; Fax, +1-919-515-7422.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
J. L. Yang, J. F. You, Y. Y. Li, P. Wu, and S. J. Zheng
Magnesium Enhances Aluminum-Induced Citrate Secretion in Rice Bean Roots (Vigna umbellata) by Restoring Plasma Membrane H+-ATPase Activity
Plant Cell Physiol., January 1, 2007; 48(1): 66 - 73.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
W. Deng, K. Luo, D. Li, X. Zheng, X. Wei, W. Smith, C. Thammina, L. Lu, Y. Li, and Y. Pei
Overexpression of an Arabidopsis magnesium transport gene, AtMGT1, in Nicotiana benthamiana confers Al tolerance
J. Exp. Bot., December 1, 2006; 57(15): 4235 - 4243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.