Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sakai, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kuroiwa, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Sakai, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kuroiwa, T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Sakai, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kuroiwa, T.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Plant and Cell Physiology, 1998, Vol. 39, No. 6 581-589
© 1998

Comparative Analysis of Plastid Gene Expression in Tobacco Chloroplasts and Proplastids: Relationship between Transcription and Transcript Accumulation

Atsushi Sakai1, Takeshi Suzuki2, Yutaka Miyazawa, Shigeyuki Kawano, Toshiyuki Nagata and Tsuneyoshi Kuroiwa

Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, University of Tokyo Hongo, Tokyo, 113 Japan

1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Fax + 81-(0)3-3814-1408, E-mail sakai@biol.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp

We compared the modes of plastid gene expression between chloroplasts and proplastids in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.). Chloroplast-nuclei (chloroplast-nucleoids) and proplastid-nuclei (proplastid-nucleoids) were isolated from mature leaves and cultured cells (line BY-2), respectively, and their transcriptional activities in vitro were compared. Overall transcriptional activity of the isolated chloroplast-nuclei (250 pmol UTP (µg DNA)–1 h–1) was approximately 25 times that of the isolated proplastid-nuclei (9.7 pmol UTP (µg DNA)–1 h–1). This difference in overall transcriptional activities was accompanied by intensive modulation of the relative transcriptional activities of individual genes. Differences in the transcriptional activities of nine plastid genes (psbA, atpA, rpoB, psaA/B, atpB, rbcL, petB, rpl16, and rrn23) between the isolated chloroplast- and proplastid-nuclei correlated moderately with differences in the amounts of corresponding transcripts accumulating in leaves and cultured cells. This suggests that transcriptional regulation is responsible, to a considerable extent, for the differential accumulation of plastid transcripts. Possible mechanisms underlying the differential transcription in proplastids and chloroplasts are discussed in relation to the existence of multiple RNA polymerases and structural changes involving plastid-nuclei.

2Present address: Department of Cell Biology, Institute of Molecular and Cellular Regulation, Gunma University, Maebashi, Gunma, 371 Japan.

(Received February 21, 1998; Accepted March 13, 1998)
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.