Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shiraishi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Oku, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Shiraishi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Oku, H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Shiraishi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Oku, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Plant and Cell Physiology, 1994, Vol. 35, No. 8 1107-1119
© 1994


Mini Review

Suppressors: Determinants of Specificity Produced by Plant Pathogens

Tomonori Shiraishi1, Tetsuji Yamada1, Kohji Saitoh2, Toshiaki Kato1,2, Kazuhiro Toyoda1, Hirohumi Yoshioka1,3, Hong-Mo Kim1, Yuki Ichinose1, Makoto Tahara2 and Hachiro Oku1

1Laboratory of Plant Pathology and Genetic Engineering, College of Agriculture Okayama University, Okayama, 700 Japan
2Advanced Materials & Technology Research Laboratory, Nippon Steel Corporation Kawasaki, 211 Japan

Plant pathogens secrete suppressors that delay or prevent the host defense responses, with resultant conditioning of host cells such that they become susceptible even to avirulent or non-pathogenic microorganisms. Suppressors have been characterized as glycoproteins, glycopeptides, peptides and anionic and nonanionic glucans. A suppressor itself is non-toxic to plant cells and, thus, it can be distinguished from host-specific toxins produced by certain pathogens. Suppressors disturb fundamental functions of host plasma membranes. For example, the suppressor from a pea pathogen, Mycosphaerella pinodes, inhibits both the ATPase activity and polyphosphoinositide metabolism in pea plasma membranes, causing the temporary suppression of the signal-transduction pathway that leads to the expression of defense genes, which encode key enzymes in the biosynthetic pathway to phytoalexin. In this review, evidence for the role of suppressors in the determination of plant host-parasite specificity is summarized.

3Present address: Plant Pathology Laboratory, School of Agriculture, Nagoya University, Chikusa, Nagoya, 464-01 Japan


(Received August 8, 1994; )
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
V. Tellstrom, B. Usadel, O. Thimm, M. Stitt, H. Kuster, and K. Niehaus
The Lipopolysaccharide of Sinorhizobium meliloti Suppresses Defense-Associated Gene Expression in Cell Cultures of the Host Plant Medicago truncatula
Plant Physiology, February 1, 2007; 143(2): 825 - 837.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
Y. Ishiga, A. Funato, T. Tachiki, K. Toyoda, T. Shiraishi, T. Yamada, and Y. Ichinose
Expression of the 12-Oxophytodienoic Acid 10,11-Reductase Gene in the Compatible Interaction between Pea and Fungal Pathogen
Plant Cell Physiol., October 15, 2002; 43(10): 1210 - 1220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.