Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Matsumoto, H.
Right arrow Articles by Morimura, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Matsumoto, H.
Right arrow Articles by Morimura, S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Matsumoto, H.
Right arrow Articles by Morimura, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Plant and Cell Physiology, 1980, Vol. 21, No. 6 951-959
© 1980


Article

Repressed template activity of chromatin of pea roots treated by aluminium

Hideaki Matsumoto and Seiichiro Morimura1

Institute for Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Okayama University Chuo 2-20-1, Kurashiki, Okayama 710 and Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Kyoto University Kyoto 606, Japan

To determine the mechanism of aluminium toxicity in the pea root, we investigated both the in vivo and in vitro effects of aluminium on chromatin. The ratio of histone or non-histone proteins to DNA in chromatin was slightly increased by aluminium treatment. However, chromatin with an rf of 0.086 (rf: molar ratio of bound aluminium to DNA-phosphate) prepared from aluminium treated roots had template activity for RNA synthesis that was half of the control. The template activity of the chromatin treated with aluminium in vitro decreases with increasing rf values.

In vitro treatment of chromatin with aluminium altered the spectrophotometric properties of chromatin, including the shift up in the absorption of the region beyond 320 nm and the decrease in the ratio of maximum to minimum absorption, with increasing concentrations of treated aluminium. The dialysis of DNA or histone against an aluminium solution indicates that scarcely any binding of aluminium to histone occurred, but the binding of aluminium to DNA took place rapidly.

1Nippon Shinyaku Co. Ltd., Minami-ku, Kyoto 601, Japan.


(Received June 20, 1980; )
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.