Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Melcarek, P. K.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, G. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Melcarek, P. K.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, G. N.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Melcarek, P. K.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, G. N.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Plant and Cell Physiology, 1977, Vol. 18, No. 5 1099-1107
© 1977

Article

The effects of chilling stress on the chlorophyll fluorescence of leaves1

Peter K. Melcarek2 and Gregory N. Brown3

School of Forestry, Fisheries and Wildlife, Agriculture 1-30, University of Missouri Columbia, Missouri 65201, U.S.A.

The effects of temperature lowering on the steady state chlorophyll fluorescence of leaves was investigated. Leaves from chill-sensitive species responded to a greater degree than did leaves from chill-resistant species. Arrhenius plots of fluorescence change vs temperature yielded a straight line with no breaks that would have indicated a membrane lipid phase change. We measured the fluorescence changes at high and low excitation intensitites and monitored fluorescence at 690 and 735 nm. The low temperature induced fluorescence increase and the ratio of 690 to 735 nm fluorescence were generally greater at lower light intensities. Treatment with DCMU reduced the effects of temperature on fluorescence. However, the effect of low intensity pulsing light on the fluorescence yield of DCMU-treated leaves proved to be temperature dependent. At a low pulse rate (2 msec pulse, 5 pps) a logarithmic increase in fluorescence as a function of temperature was noted. Chill-sensitive species proved to be more responsive than chill-resistant species. Slight differences between hardened and unhardened material were noted. While the causal factors for the differential sensitivity of species to temperature lowering were not investigated, fluorescence monitoring has proved to be a convenient and accurate method for investigating chill-sensitivity in leaves.

1 Contribution from the Missouri Agricultural Experiment Station. Journal Series Number 7791.

2 Present address: Florigen Greenhouses, 1351 E. Silver Lake Road, Traverse City, Michigan 49684, U.S.A.

3 Present address: Department of Forestry, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, U.S.A.

(Received March 14, 1977; )
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.