Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Masuda, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Yamagata, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Masuda, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Yamagata, Y.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Masuda, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Yamagata, Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Plant and Cell Physiology, 1974, Vol. 15, No. 6 1083-1092
© 1974


Article

Stress relaxation properties of the cell wall of tissue segments under different growth conditions

Yoshio Masuda, Ryoichi Yamamoto, Hideto Kawamura and Yoshiki Yamagata

Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Osaka City University Sumiyoshi-ku, Osaka 558, Japan

Stress-relaxation parameters were compared under different experimental conditions using 5th internode segments of light-grown pea seedlings and coleoptile segments of dark-grown Avena seedlings. The following results were obtained.

1. In a short incubation period at 25°C, IAA caused a decrease in the minimum relaxation time, To, of the epidermal cell wall of pea internodes when it induced elongation; the optimum concentration of IAA for decreasing To was 10 mg/liter.

2. At all concentrations of IAA used, 0.1–1000 mg/liter, the relationship between the To value of the epidermal cell wall peeled from segments incubated for 2 hr and the subsequent elongation rate in 2–3 hr incubation was linear, indicating that the To value of the cell wall at a certain time regulates the rate of the following elongation.

3. When segments of pea epicotyls or Avena coleoptiles were incubated in mannitol solution of various concentrations in the presence and absence of IAA and then allowed to grow in the absence of both mannitol and IAA, the segments extended differently depending upon the mannitol concentration, which was less than 0.3 M, given during preincubation.

4. The To and b (relaxation rate, {Delta}S/{Delta}log t) values were smaller in the cell wall of segments which extended more, than in those which extended less. In this case, 0.2 M mannitol solution was most effective, since it inhibited IAA-induced elongation during pre-incubation and the segments thus incubated extended the most afterward.

5. Extensibility, mm/gr, seemed to parallel the elongation which had occurred during pre-incubation, indicating that this value, contrary to To, represented at least partly the result of elongation.

From these results we concluded that the growth rate to follow is regulated by the minimum stress relaxation time, To, and possibly by the relaxation rate, b, of the cell wall before extension, and these parameters may represent certain biochemical modifications of the cell wall components needed for cell extension.

(Received August 12, 1974; )
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
T. Masselter and T. Speck
Quantitative and qualitative changes in primary and secondary stem organization of Aristolochia macrophylla during ontogeny: functional growth analysis and experiments
J. Exp. Bot., August 1, 2008; 59(11): 2955 - 2967.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
P. Schopfer
Biomechanics of plant growth
Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2006; 93(10): 1415 - 1425.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
D.S. Thompson
Extensiometric determination of the rheological properties of the epidermis of growing tomato fruit
J. Exp. Bot., June 1, 2001; 52(359): 1291 - 1301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.